March-2018 Essays with Sample response

Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 

 

Comfort, time and internal peace are required to make learning efficient. Hence, it is not possible to do job and study side by side. Occupation and education disturb one another. I strongly oppose this statement because handling both these together is easily possible with strong willpower. I will elaborate points to support my opinion in the further paragraphs.

Firstly, there are a lot of people in western countries, who do a part-time study and work full-time or vice-versa. It all depends on the preference of the individuals. If they want to bear some hassle and become more productive in their life, they can manage both things side by side. This not only makes them knowledgeable but increase their potential as well.

Secondly, there are a few parents who cannot bear the expenses of their child’s education. Resultantly, they put their children into some labor so that they can earn money for the family. But it does not mean that the child has to abandon his dream of acquiring education. With firm determination, they can continue their education and work to feed their family as well.

Finally, sometimes people think they have completed their education, but when they get a full-time job, they realize that diploma or degree can increase their chances of promotion. Moreover, some employers select the potential employee from colleges while they are studying and pay for their Masters or Advanced Diplomas because they see their profit in that investment. Hence, studying and working side by side helps candidates to grow professionally.

In conclusion, working and studying is very much possible. It just depends on the dedication and determination of the person. People should do both study and work side by side to make themselves more skilled and capable.

 

In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon?

 

Cashless means “no cash” but in today’s world, meaning of cashless converted from no cash to digital cash. Where a significant amount of people think that there are lots of benefits of cashless society, some people think that digital society is curse to society. This essay will discuss about merits of cashless society.

Firstly, its worth considering that need of the human is changing daily. We can easily see that from barter system to cash and now cashless. The benefits of cashless is that people don’t have to keep money all the time. However, digitize society helping user to use plastic card which is easy to use and require no cash to carry. Also, it is useful to pay exact amount instead of round off figure. For an instance, instead of $59.30, user will only have to pay $59.30 instead of $59.50 or $57.

On the contrary, cashless society is also facing some challenges. Regardless to its benefits of being cashless, person must stay alert while transactions. There are possibilities where someone can misuse and can do unwanted transaction. Researches has found that some people face concerns about misuse of e-cards. For example hackers can steal your confidential details, while paying the bills or online transactions and can misuse it.

Taking everything considered, it is clear that all the upcoming and booming technologies, helping to society, but on the contrary it is having their drawbacks as well. So while using latest technology, stay alert and focus. Also user must take steps to be secure before using cashless facility.

 

 

In the past 100 years, there have been many inventions such as antibiotics, airplanes, and computers. What do you think is the most important invention of them? Why? Greatest invention in the last 100 years, medicine, science or technology?

It is evident how life has changed since technology has been introduced in the human life. When we think about technology mostly the first thing that comes to our mind is the image of a computer. Technological advancements such as computers have been designed and created with the only purpose to help humans and make their lives easier. Computers have become indispensable in any workplace where they are basically considered a compliment for people to help them in developing their activities. In fact, computers are the greatest invention of all time because they have multitasking features that can minimize your work, they can display and let you manipulate stored information, and they are used in almost all fields for any purpose.

First of all, computers have multitasking features that can minimize the work you have to do. For example, computers avoid you having to calculate any result of doing the math, the only thing you must do is to type the information needed and your work is done.

Secondly, computers can display and let you manipulate stored information. In other words, you don’t need to use paper in order to store any information on shelves. You don’t even have to rewrite a whole paper because you did a mistake or you have to add more information to the written form. You can have as many files as you can on your computer and organize them the way you like it without having to use any extra material or space.

Finally, computers are used in almost all fields for any purpose such as entertainment, education, and any type of job. For example, you can use computers to play video games, watch movies, listen to music or chat on the internet for entertainment. In education or any job, you can use them for video conferences, PowerPoint presentations or just using their basic features discussed in the first point.

Therefore computers are the greatest invention of all time because they reduce the time consumption of your activities, you can save your information and edit it anytime, and they let you do almost everything you need. Computers have become the most powerful tool ever created.

 

The mass media, including television, radio, and newspapers, have great influence in shaping people’s ideas. To what extent do you agree or disagree? (Give reasons and relevant examples to support your answer.)

Recently, the phenomenon of mass media powerful influence and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of shaping people’s minds is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that growing public awareness can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From a social standpoint, channels of communication can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in this fact that media, as well as information revolution, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered changing people’s lifestyle. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both print media and visual media apparently can be seen.

Within the realm of psychology, cultural influence might increase the consequences of information sharing. Moreover, fundamental aspects of broadcasting relate to this reality that the demerits of societal cohesion pertain to degrade family relationship. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of waste time is correlated negatively with obtaining information. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of messaging applications.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of global media far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of internet, TV, and newspapers prove the significance of effective communication, but also pinpoint social media implications.

 

Getting a good job after completing university education or developing soft skills for job, which one is more important? Discuss both sides

The discussion on getting a good job after completing university education or developing soft skills is debatable one and each side has its logical arguments. Many believe that getting a job is a good way, while others believe that developing soft skills is crucial for any job. In this essay, I shall discuss both the sides of the arguments and provide my view.

On the one hand, those who argue for getting the job says that the skills will be developed as we start working for the specific job. Different type of jobs needs different soft skills. Spending time on the soft skills before joining a job is completely meaningless. For example, the job in the marketing needs speaking skill compare to writing. So, getting the job after completing the university education is the best way.

On the other hand, those who argue for the soft skills says that it provides a foundation for any kind of jobs. Firstly, the soft skills build the necessary skills for a different type of jobs. According to the Times Magazine Edition June-2016, the soft skills plays a crucial role in any job. Secondly, the soft skills help to get understanding of the basics of any jobs. Lastly, for certain types of jobs, the soft skills are necessary
compare to the main skills.

In conclusion, after completing university education developing the soft skills is a crucial as it provides foundation and awareness for the related skills. I strongly recommend for developing soft skills over completing the university education and getting the job.

 

Pollution by emission of carbon dioxide

The whole world nowadays facing massive impact due to pollution which causes various problem.one of the mode of pollution is carbon emission contributing by transports. Controlling own a single car for each family may significantly reduce the traffic congestion and pollution.while some people think to refrain single car per family burgeoning to control the traffic, however, some people think is not a good option to restrict the traffic control.this essay will discuss there is a possibility of controlling traffic and pollution by holding one car for a single family.

Each one of their family members should have their individual car so that no one does not require any one’s dependency no matter wherever can be travel anywhere at any time.this is most sophisticated way, as this saves a lot of time and comfortable where the area has less frequent of public transport to commute the people.for example, if one person wants to go office at the same time another one wants to travel somewhere for shopping it is possible to go ahead if we own each one of them having a car.as the result of owning the single car it compromises their fulfillment without any challenge.

Despite these arguments, it is certain that having single car create a pollution and traffic congestion because if the road accommodates two cars at a time where if four plying the car absolutely produce congestion. moreover, all the cars emit carbon dioxide which is the most contributor to contaminate the environment.for example, each one driving a single car in a business day to go office in a peak hour it will create traffic congestion and it may delay reaching destination.this can be achieved if there is a law imposed to refrain to purchase many cars for a single family and embark frequent public transport to commute the people.

To conclude,though ownership of having single car will be more comfortable to travel, in my opinion purchasing many cars for a single family should be restricted to decrease overcrowding and deteriorate the atmosphere.

 

Capital punishment

The discussion on the capital punishment is a debatable one and each side has it’s logical arguments. The capital punishment has more of a positive impact on the society than a negative. In this essay, I shall discuss both the sides of the argument and provide my opinion.

On the one hand, those who are against the capital punishment argue that it does not serve the purpose. They believe that life is a crucial gift for anyone and no one should allow to take it. They argue that capital punishment is not the solu

There is an ongoing debate among the people about a big game hunting conservation. Hunting of the animals in any way is not the correct way for animal conservation. In this essay, I will discuss this problem and explore possible solutions.

On the one hand, those who argue for the big game hunting say that it provides a good alternative for animal conservations. It helps people to complete their hunting experience without killing the animals. There are many statistics available where animal hunting has reduced after implementing big hunting games.

However, those who oppose the big game hunting have various reasons. Firstly, they believe that any kind of hunting is harmful to the animals in endangered. According to the Times Magazine Edition June-2016, 35% of endangered animals population is declining despite conservations. Secondly, many believe that the big game hunting encourages people for hunting in wild as well. Thirdly, animal conservations should provide an environment without any distraction and interference. Lastly, the conservation of animal should be done by the government with proper laws in place which provide a suitable environment.

To conclude, the big game hunting is not the correct way of the animal conversations as it is harmful, does not provide the right environment and destructive for any species.

tion to the crime one has committed. For example, it is found that 50% crimes are performed under defense condition. According to them, everyone should allow for second chance to prove oneself and equal life opportunity.

However, regardless of these arguments, there are various reasons to support the capital punishment. Firstly, it is found that such punishment creates fear in the criminals before performing any such crime. According to the Times Magazine Edition June-2016, it is found that the capital punishment helps to reduce the crime. Secondly, the law of capital punishment create sense of security for the society. Thirdly, it helps to control the society of difference and individuality.

In conclusion, the capital punishment helps to make the society more secure, less violent and control the individual safety.

 

The Big Game Hunting

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *